| International
Property, Agents, Brokers, Developers, Buyers, Sellers,
Investors, FindInternationalRealEstate.com
is a British owned company that has been designed as answer to Global
property marketing needs for developers and agents alike. We can achieve these goals with some very simple cost effective solutions that can be tailor made to your needs. Over the last 10 years we have built a database of 3 million international professional agents across the 40 top property buying countries of the world. The database contains only professional agents dealing with international properties, making this a great tool to attract international buyers. We are constantly sending out information world wide via our network and it has proved to be very successful tool in finding foreign buyers. We believe that if you have a good product you cannot fail to sell your properties through this system. Imagine 3 million agents globally seeing your property. If you can’t find a buyer with this system, then it would be a good time to get out of the business. We are able to create multilingual campaigns for to reach a very targeted audience. Once you have advertised with us, you will be given access to use our database and we will help set everything up for you! FindInternationalRealEstate.com provides benefits to Brokers and Agents alike by assisting them to efficiently and profitably facilitate local and international business through its worldwide network of Brokers and Agents. FindInternationalRealEstate.com is a member of the International Consortium of Real Estate Associations (ICREA), which is comprised of more than 25 leading national real estate organizations, representing Brokers and Agents worldwide, each of whom adhere to a code of conduct. |
November 2007
By Frederick E. Flick, Ph.D.
Real Estate Economics Consultant and
Lawrence Yun, Ph.D.
National Association of REALTORS®
Any recent media report about labor markets, the financial sector, or trade is likely to include at least a mention about the “globalization” of the worlds' economies. That globalization applies to housing as well.
NAR Research regularly reports on the level of foreign investment in U.S. real estate. Recently the Association has begun a series of surveys to determine the level of home-buying activity in the U.S. by non-U.S citizens or part-time U.S. residents (non-immigrants) whose primary home is in another country. Gathering data for these reports is relatively easy – there are public records of foreign companies purchasing stock in U.S. real estate companies, and NAR has developed the capability to survey its members relatively quickly about their experience with home buyers from other countries purchasing a U.S. property. With the U.S. dollar valued lower against many foreign (particularly European) currencies, the trend of foreign purchases of and investment in U.S. real estate is a trend that will probably continue for quite a while.
But the trend of Americans purchasing foreign real estate is not as easily discerned. The data is difficult to gather. Most REALTORS® do not broker properties located in another country. Other national (non-U.S.) real estate professional organizations – many which of which have cooperative agreements with NAR – do not necessarily survey their members about their business with American buyers of homes outside the U.S. While the U.S. Census Bureau, in its regularly scheduled surveys of all households residing in the U.S., does ask whether or not the household lives in a rented or owned domicile, it does not inquire whether or not the household owns a foreign-based property. Additionally, concerns about the number of and locations where Americans have purchased a foreign-based home raises issues of privacy and security.
To begin to answer the question – what is the level of foreign-home buying activity by
U.S. citizens and permanent residents – NAR commissioned a study to look at indirect measurements of those Americans moving, working and/or living abroad and whether or not they purchased a residential property in foreign countries. This report is just the start of a process to measure that level of home buying by Americans abroad. Although it does not provide direct, clean statistics on such activity, we hope this report does provide some approximations on the prevalence and direction of activity (increasing or decreasing) of home-buying by Americans in various foreign locations.
Donald Trump is building condos to sell to Americans in Baja California (Mexico). In that same country, the Lake Chapala area near Guadalajara has been a popular retirement area for Americans for decades. Recently, condos in Costa Rica have become popular, as have as villas in Tuscany and the south of France. Even properties in the Balkans have become short-stay vacation residences for many Americans. Exclusive real estate property listing magazines such as Sotheby’s International and real estate ads in The Wall Street Journal promote properties in places from Morocco to Patagonia. All this is evidence that for many, owning a home abroad is as much a part of the “American Dream” as is owning a home in the U.S.
Given the apparent rise in international real estate transactions by U.S. citizens, the National Association of REALTORS® commissioned an investigation to determine what if any measures exist on the number of residential homes in foreign countries purchased by Americans.
The project also specified that several possible indicators of trends in this activity should be examined. These included U.S. State Department data on the numbers of Americans living abroad, Social Security Administration data on the number of American retirees collecting Social Security benefits abroad, and Internal Revenue Service statistics on the number of tax returns claiming the housing exclusion based on foreign-earned income.
This white paper looks at those indicators and analyses and discusses the issues and challenges involved in measuring American foreign-home buying trends. As part of this study, several experts on publicly available housing data were consulted. The organizations they represented included the New York Federal Reserve Bank Research Department, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors International Flow of Funds Section, the U.S. Department of State Consular Affairs Bureau, the Statistics of Income Branch of the Internal Revenue Service, and the Social Security Administration’s Policy Statistics Branch.*
Finally, a Google search of private property listing sites on the Web suggested that while there are many online sources of information on buying properties in various foreign countries, neither they nor the three sources cited above provide any statistics measuring the aggregate numbers of properties owned by Americans (stock currently owned), or the flow of homes (sales volume trends) sold to Americans over a recent period.
It will always be difficult to accurately measure the stock or flow of foreign homes owned/purchased by Americans. This is because individuals can purchase property abroad and they do not necessarily file forms with the IRS or any government entity regarding these purchases. At this point, it is not known whether any foreign countries collect data on American real estate ownership or whether they have data processing systems that can produce any estimates. But even though there are no available official figures for the number of homes or vacation properties Americans have purchased in foreign countries, we can make some estimates based on an examination of the data from the State Department, the Social Security Administration and the IRS.
* The Bureau of the Census was also asked whether it had any measures of foreign-home ownership by Americans; unfortunately, the Bureau does not currently collect such information.
The most accurate potential source of information about American home purchases abroad on a country-by-country basis is the IRS Foreign Earned Income schedule, Form 2555, that is filed with the Form 1040. Form 2555 includes a line asking the filer whether he/she purchased a home abroad. Data from the U.S. State Department is also worth examining, as the department maintains records on the number of Americans living and working (even part-time) abroad. The Social Security Administration's (SSA) record-keeping includes information about the number of beneficiaries who receive SSA checks and where those checks are mailed.
A set of simulated estimates of potential housing purchases were constructed from the three data sources using known American rates of homeownership, household sizes, and a Census Bureau staffer’s estimate of the number of American retired workers living overseas. The figures varied widely by data set and essentially cover distinct segments of the market of possible American foreign property buyers. (Note: for purposes of this study, “Americans” includes U.S. citizens as well as those classified as “permanent” U.S. residents who may not be citizens.)
Americans living abroad. An evaluation of the data series that were analyzed suggests that there were possibly as many as 500,000 to 600,000 foreign properties owned by Americans living abroad.
American retirees living abroad. Analysis of retired American workers living abroad suggests their ownership rate is likely to be in the range of 54,000 to 63,000 properties.
U.S. workers working abroad. Examination of Americans working abroad and filing Form 2555, suggests that their foreign-home ownership rates are probably in the range of 80,000 to 100,000.
Comparison of the estimates from the retirees (based on Social Security data) and those working abroad with the State Department base, suggests that domestic demand for vacation and short-stay foreign properties may be in the range of 370,000 to 440,000 units.
Overall, the latter two segments suggest approximately 150,000 foreign properties owned by retirees and Americans working in a foreign country.
One segment not explicitly analyzed was the number of Americans residing in the U.S. who own properties in North American, Caribbean or Central American countries. This is likely a substantial number given the easy access to countries in these regions through air transport or even automobile. These figures could substantially exceed the estimates for the last two segments.*
* Unfortunately, even the Census Bureau cannot answer any questions regarding foreign properties owned by U.S. residents. There is currently no question on the Census Form addressing this. And while the National Association of REALTORS® conducts a regular survey on vacation/second-home purchasers, its study focuses on domestically owned properties.
As part of the initial investigation, a general search of the Internet was undertaken seeking information on Americans buying homes abroad. This work uncovered a set of estimates of the number of Americans living abroad by country. A Geneva, Switzerland-based organization for Americans abroad provided a 1999 list, sourcing the “U.S. State Department Website.”1 This file contains the most recently published figures on the number of Americans overseas and provides a baseline; however, no further data exists to determine a trend. A search of the State Department website turned up no similar information. Conversations with the State Department's Public Information Counselor Affairs section revealed that after the events of September 11, 2001, these statistics were no longer compiled in a public database for security reasons.
The 1999 figures are estimates and enumerate, by country, the number of American citizens living or working in foreign countries, including U.S. government employees and military personnel stationed abroad. It is important to note that these figures do not differentiate among these three groups. It is most likely that the demand for owner housing abroad is strongest for those who are private citizens, as they usually have to provide their own housing. But, there are Americans whose primary residence is in the U.S. and who spend time abroad working. They are more likely to have foreign residences as part-time or vacation properties. It is also likely that the State Department data do not reflect many of these individuals. Nevertheless, the State Department figures provide some base for honing in on those countries where Americans have been and may be likely to purchase homes.
Table 1 shows that just over one-half of Americans living abroad in 1999 were located in the Americas – Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean islands. Europe was next with 28%, followed by Asia/Pacific at 12%.
Table 1. American Citizens Living Abroad By Major Region: 1999
| Region | U.S. Citizens in Country | % of All U.S. Living Abroad |
| Americas Europe Asia/Pacific* Middle East Africa Total World | 2,113,295 1,169,438 517,800 295,645 67,632 4,163,810 | 50.8% 28.1% 12.4% 7.1% 1.6% 100.0% |
*includes Australia as well as Oceania Source: U.S. State Department, July 1999
Americans seem to like to stay close to home. Table 2 lists the estimates for the top 10 countries, the cumulative total and percentages. In 1999, Mexico accounted for about 25% of all Americans living abroad, with Canada a distant second at 17%. Note that the numbers and percentages drop off dramatically after Mexico and Canada. The United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland) is ranked third at just over 5%, with Germany accounting for about the same percentage of American residents. Israel and Italy comprise 4% each. Finally, the Philippines, Australia, France, and Spain each claim about 100,000 residing Americans with percentages ranging from 2% to 2.5%. In the rest of the world, the percentages drop to 1% or less for other countries.
Table 2. American Citizens Living Abroad
| Top Countries: 1999 | ||
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Citizens | % of All U.S. | |
| Country/Region | in Country | Living Abroad |
| Mexico | 1,036,300 | 24.9% |
| Canada | 687,700 | 16.5% |
| United Kingdom | 224,000 | 5.4% |
| Germany | 210,880 | 5.1% |
| Israel | 184,195 | 4.4% |
| Italy | 168,967 | 4.1% |
| Philippines | 105,000 | 2.5% |
| Australia | 102,800 | 2.5% |
| France | 101,750 | 2.4% |
| Spain | 94,513 | 2.3% |
| Total of Top 10 | 2,916,105 | 70.0% |
Chart 1 visually depicts the predominance of Mexico and Canada in terms of American foreign living locations.
Chart 1. Top Ten Foreign Countries (percentage distribution of Americans living abroad)
In the Caribbean, Central and South American areas, the Dominican Republic accounted for 2% of Americans living abroad, followed by Brazil at 1%. Colombia and Argentina each accounted for 0.7%, Venezuela 0.6%, Costa Rica and Panama each one-half of a percent, and Peru only registered one-third of a percent. Within Europe, Greece claimed 1.7% of Americans living abroad, followed by Ireland at 1.1%.
In Asia, ranking below the Philippines and Australia, was Japan with 1.7%, followed by China at 1.6% and Taiwan with 0.9%. Israel accounted for 4.4% of Americans living abroad, but other countries in the Middle East reported lower percentages: Saudi Arabia less than 1%, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen at 0.4%, and Lebanon, Jordan, Kuwait, and Turkey at 0.2%. South Africa led the African region with almost 11,500 Americans, accounting for 0.3%, with Egypt close at just under 11,000, about 0.3%. Nigeria followed at 0.2%, but the remaining African nations were at most about 0.1% of all Americans abroad. (More detail can be found in the Appendix tables at the end of this report.)
What do these figures tell us about Americans living overseas? First of all, Americans abroad tend to be located close to America. Both Canada and Mexico are familiar and close to home. The Caribbean islands have become popular vacation areas for Americans as well as the home of many offshore corporations. The Dominican Republic, with 82,000 Americans abroad, exceeded all of the individual countries in Central and South America. Only Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, Venezuela, Costa Rica and Panama are likely to have property ownership potential for many Americans.* While the current political situation in Venezuela is negative regarding the U.S., Costa Rica and Panama have been pushing vacation condo development to North Americans since the late 1990s.
Also, while some of those in the Americas region are working for the State Department, they are not likely to be military; most are likely to be working for multinational corporations or are retirees. Some of these American residents of foreign countries may hold dual citizenship, or have been born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Those “connections” to the U.S. increases the probability that American property ownership is greater in these countries. Similarly, the United Kingdom has had close connections with North America (both the U.S. and Canada), with a common cultural heritage and language. Many Americans have worked in the U.K. for American or European companies. The relationships between London-and New York-based financial institutions and corporations have grown stronger over the past decade as western finance has become a worldwide industry.
Based on State Department data, we can probably obtain potentially accurate estimates of American property ownership abroad if we focus on the Americas and a few European countries. The next section of this paper examines the Social Security Administration data on retirees and the benefits they are receiving. This will help focus in on where American retirees are likely to be buying.
* It is also likely that Americans are looking to Puerto Rico as a location for homes. Even though it is technically a
U.S. territory, Puerto Rico is viewed by some as a foreign country. While figures on buyers of Puerto Rico-properties as second/vacation homes are not available, due to its proximity to the mainland U.S. -- as well as its close ties to the U.S. -- an examination of second-home-buying activity in Puerto Rico by Americans would be fruitful. According to the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, in 2006 1.01 million loans were originated for second home purchases; the median loan amount was $118,700. The median income of second-home buyers was $118,000.
Most Americans anticipate receiving Social Security retirement benefits when they retire in their 60s or 70s. It is also the case that legal aliens who pay Social Security taxes are allowed to collect Social Security benefits when they retire. Table 3 shows the top 25 countries where these benefit checks are sent. The most recent data available is for December 2005. The data are taken from the Annual Statistical Supplement of the Social Security Bulletin which reports the total number of beneficiaries, retired worker beneficiaries, as well as the number receiving disability benefits, widowers’ benefits, and child beneficiaries.2 We have reproduced the data for all beneficiaries and retired worker categories only. Not surprisingly, retirees are the largest group among all beneficiaries and the benefits largely accrue to that group.
Table 3. Top 25 Countries by Number of Social Security Benefit Recipients Living/Working Abroad- December 2005
| All | Retired | Pct. All | Total | Pct. Retired | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beneficiaries | Workers | Beneficiaries | Percent | Workers | Percent | |
| All countries | 441,693 | 263,387 | 100.0% |
|
100.0% |
|
| Canada | 100,747 | 59,022 | 22.8% | 22.8% | 22.4% | 22.4% |
| Mexico | 47,384 | 22,973 | 10.7% | 33.5% | 8.7% | 31.1% |
| Italy | 33,865 | 20,010 | 7.7% | 41.2% | 7.6% | 38.7% |
| Germany | 33,448 | 20,837 | 7.6% | 48.8% | 7.9% | 46.6% |
| U.K. | 30,210 | 18,884 | 6.8% | 55.6% | 7.2% | 53.8% |
| Greece | 22,640 | 13,416 | 5.1% | 60.7% | 5.1% | 58.9% |
| Philippines | 19,309 | 9,165 | 4.4% | 65.1% | 3.5% | 62.4% |
| Portugal | 12,050 | 8,243 | 2.7% | 67.8% | 3.1% | 65.5% |
| France | 10,661 | 6,930 | 2.4% | 70.3% | 2.6% | 68.1% |
| Spain | 9,875 | 5,817 | 2.2% | 72.5% | 2.2% | 70.4% |
| Israel | 8,571 | 4,879 | 1.9% | 74.4% | 1.9% | 72.2% |
| Ireland | 8,518 | 5,738 | 1.9% | 76.4% | 2.2% | 74.4% |
| Japan | 7,972 | 3,980 | 1.8% | 78.2% | 1.5% | 75.9% |
| Australia | 6,656 | 4,310 | 1.5% | 79.7% | 1.6% | 77.5% |
| Dom. Repub. | 6,503 | 4,270 | 1.5% | 81.1% | 1.6% | 79.2% |
| Switzerland | 6,435 | 4,367 | 1.5% | 82.6% | 1.7% | 80.8% |
| Norway | 6,432 | 3,820 | 1.5% | 84.1% | 1.5% | 82.3% |
| Poland | 5,268 | 3,607 | 1.2% | 85.3% | 1.4% | 83.6% |
| Netherlands | 4,407 | 2,798 | 1.0% | 86.2% | 1.1% | 84.7% |
| Costa Rica | 3,540 | 2,418 | 0.8% | 87.0% | 0.9% | 85.6% |
| Sweden | 3,464 | 2,287 | 0.8% | 87.8% | 0.9% | 86.5% |
| Colombia | 3,301 | 2,427 | 0.7% | 88.6% | 0.9% | 87.4% |
| Argentina | 3,221 | 2,052 | 0.7% | 89.3% | 0.8% | 88.2% |
| Jamaica | 2,724 | 2,182 | 0.6% | 89.9% | 0.8% | 89.0% |
| Austria | 2,452 | 1,559 | 0.6% | 90.5% | 0.6% | 89.6% |
Source:Table 5.J11, Annual Statistical Supplement 2006, Social Security Bulletin, 2006.
Examining the 2005 data, we find that the top 25 countries, by all beneficiaries and retired workers categories, account for 90% of all recipients in those groups. Canada and Mexico account for almost one-third of all beneficiaries living abroad. The percentage rises to 54% when including Italy, Germany, and the U.K. Finally, the Philippines, Portugal, France and Spain push the cumulative percentage total to around 70%; and, Israel and Ireland bring it to 75%.
Similar to the results from the State Department data in which the top five countries account for slightly more than half of all Americans living abroad, the the top five countries comprise about 50% of all Social Security beneficiaries, and another seven countries raises the cumulative to 75%. Canada and Mexico are the top countries in terms of Social Security beneficiaries, followed by Italy, Germany, and the U.K. (Interestingly, the top 5 countries in terms of residence also included Mexico, Canada, the U.K. and Germany.)
Charts 2 through 4 graphically depict the trends for all beneficiaries and retired workers, in aggregates and on a country-by-country basis. For the most part the relationships are linear with a slight positive slope, reflecting gradual increases. There have not been any dramatic changes in the figures over the period 1999-2005. Canada and Mexico are by far, the top locations. However, these numbers and locations could show significant change in a few years as the number of baby-boomers – who are affluent and have traveled more extensively – retire.
9
Over the past decade, private ownership of housing has dramatically increased around the world, with many countries experiencing ownership and building booms. Housing in many of western European countries is expensive, relative to that in other foreign countries and to the
U.S. national median home price. But housing in a number of countries on this list are quite affordable when compared to the price of homes in large U.S. metropolitan areas. A retiree who has worked for years in the U.S. and owned property could easily afford to relocate to Mexico, Canada, and southern and eastern Europe.
Those Americans with jobs located abroad and who are residing overseas do not have to pay taxes on foreign earned income; however, they are required to file a 1040 return. Along with the 1040, they file a Form 2555, Foreign Earned Income.
Under U.S. tax law, citizens and resident aliens living and working abroad can exclude a certain amount of foreign earned income and foreign housing costs exceeding those provided by an employer. For those who are self-employed, a housing deduction can be taken above a certain base housing cost. An individual has to have a foreign tax home, which usually means the taxpayer has established and maintained residence in a foreign country for an uninterrupted period that included an entire taxable year.
Foreign-earned income includes the standard components (wages and salaries, consulting fees, etc.) as well as employer-provided allowances, overseas compensation differentials, quarters, education allowances, and the full rental value of property or facilities provided by an employer. Allowable housing expenses for the most part include rent, utilities, property insurance, lease fees, and household repairs. However, they do not include interest and taxes, the cost of buying or improving a home/property, mortgage principal payments, or depreciation of the home. These limitations on deductions do not favor home purchasing.
Among various questions about the employer and foreign residency period, Form 2555 contains a blank for the name of the country and a check-box to indicate whether the housing deduction is related to ‘purchased house’, rented property, or employer-provided housing. There is also a question asking whether the taxpayer maintained a home in the U.S. while living abroad.
The Internal Revenue Service publishes analyses of its tax return databases in the Statistics of Income Bulletin 3,4,5 and provides downloadable summary data for many of its tax schedules. A major limitation of this data is that these results are available only at five-year intervals. This is because the databases are very complicated and database creation takes years to complete before analysts can start ‘mining’ the results. The available databases cover only the four tax years: 1987, 1991, 1996, and 2001. The 2006 tax year file data will be available in 2009.
Obviously, the IRS data should be further investigated as a future source of information about Americans who have purchased homes or own homes abroad. A request to the Internal Revenue Service for a special detailed cross-tabulation of data on Form 2555 would be needed in order to perform specific technical analysis. A detailed tabulation frequency by country for those filers who checked ‘purchased house’ could provide some useful information. Unfortunately, this information is not publicly reported and would have to be obtained through special computer tabulations by the IRS. This requires a Freedom of Information Request and would take several months or perhaps longer to process.
This specially tabulated data would provide estimates of the flow of housing purchases for Americans who are earning income abroad through working; however, it would not cover home purchases by Americans who work and reside in the U.S. and have purchased a foreign property; or, retirees who purchased a home overseas and still live in the U.S. Another limitation of the data gleaned from Form 2555 is that it only indicates that a taxpayer was living overseas for a tax year and lives in a purchased home. But that home could have been purchased earlier, so such a tabulation would measure only a year's worth of information that does not tell us much about either the stock of houses purchased over a period of time or the flow of purchases in a particular year.
We can, however, examine the aggregate use of the deductions for the latest year data is available. In tax year 2001 there were 130,255,237 individual tax returns filed with the IRS. Of these, 294,763 filers – 0.2% of all returns --submitted a Form 2555 with their 1040. Table 4 presents data from the 2001 Form 2555. The table shows, for the top 28 countries, the number of returns filed and average amounts of the foreign income earned. The countries are ranked by percentage of returns with Forms 2555 filed. [Note, the IRS does not provide the number of returns filed claiming the income exclusion, housing exclusion, or housing deduction on a country-by-country basis. This is likely due to sample size considerations on an individual country basis.]
Europe and Asia accounted for almost 70% of the Form 2555 filings. The percentage increases to 80% when one includes North America. Foreign income earned was about $100,000 in Europe and Asia.
On an individual country basis, most Americans earning foreign income were working in the U.K. (11.3% of all filers), followed by Canada (8.4%), Japan (8.3%), with Germany (7.9%) close behind. Hong Kong is 5th on the Form 2555 list (accounting for 4%), most likely for international business reasons. France (3%), Israel (2.9%), and Australia (2.7%) are also well ranked, and Saudi Arabia-based filers accounted for 2.5% of all Form 2555 filers. All of these countries taken together pushed the cumulative percentage figure to 51.4%. Switzerland, Taiwan, and ‘other Asian’ contributed 2.4%. But unlike the rankings based on the State Department and Social Security data, Mexico was in 13th place (at 1.9%), Italy (1.5%) was ranked 20th with the Philippines and Spain only 1%. Obviously, the rankings are following the top international business locations. Three of the top five top countries on this ranked list – the U.K., Canada and Germany – are similar to the top five in the previous analysis.
In 2001, of the 294,763 filers submitting foreign-earned income, 292,615 took the foreign earned income exclusion; the average foreign-earned income exclusion was $48,097. However, only 64,349 taxpayers filed for the housing exclusion which averaged $29,765 per filer and totaled $1.915 billion for all who took the exclusion. For the housing deduction only 4,186 filed (for a total of $92.1 million) with the average amount $21,996. The end result was that approximately 55% of those who claimed the foreign-earned income and housing exclusion, or housing deduction, or any foreign tax credit (Form 1116) had no U.S. income tax liability.
Table 4: Number of 2001 Form 2555 Filers by Top 31 Countries and Average Foreign Earned Income
| Number | Percent | Cum. | Avg. For. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region/Countries | of Returns | of All | Percent | Earn. Inc.($) |
| All Areas | 294,763 | 100.0% |
|
$93,024 |
| Europe | 105,590 | 35.8% | 35.8% | $100,488 |
| Asia | 98,037 | 33.3% | 69.1% | $101,815 |
| North America | 30,493 | 10.3% | 79.4% | $77,350 |
| South America | 15,307 | 5.2% | 84.6% | $80,224 |
| Oceania | 11,521 | 3.9% | 88.5% | $64,616 |
| Africa | 10,661 | 3.6% | 92.1% | $63,731 |
| Caribbean | 5,525 | 1.9% | 94.0% | $86,203 |
| United Kingdom | 33,344 | 11.3% | 11.3% | $165,449 |
| Canada | 24,790 | 8.4% | 19.7% | $72,023 |
| Japan | 24,578 | 8.3% | 28.1% | $93,141 |
| Germany | 23,432 | 7.9% | 36.0% | $52,461 |
| Hong Kong | 12,476 | 4.2% | 40.2% | $139,000 |
| France | 8,975 | 3.0% | 43.3% | $82,714 |
| Israel | 8,491 | 2.9% | 46.2% | $61,039 |
| Australia | 7,864 | 2.7% | 48.8% | $75,046 |
| Saudi Arabia | 7,449 | 2.5% | 51.4% | $112,479 |
| Other Asian | 6,977 | 2.4% | 53.7% | $80,208 |
| Taiwan | 6,840 | 2.3% | 56.1% | $72,236 |
| Switzerland | 6,370 | 2.2% | 58.2% | $99,780 |
| Mexico | 5,571 | 1.9% | 60.1% | $102,856 |
| China | 5,103 | 1.7% | 61.8% | $140,248 |
| South Korea | 4,885 | 1.7% | 63.5% | $92,637 |
| Singapore | 4,624 | 1.6% | 65.1% | $185,018 |
| Brazil | 4,466 | 1.5% | 66.6% | $88,717 |
| Italy | 4,301 | 1.5% | 68.0% | $67,730 |
| Unit. Arab Emir. | 4,100 | 1.4% | 69.4% | $90,334 |
| Netherlands | 3,926 | 1.3% | 70.8% | $90,057 |
| Thailand | 3,368 | 1.1% | 71.9% | $110,463 |
| Philippines | 3,266 | 1.1% | 73.0% | $56,425 |
| Belgium | 3,121 | 1.1% | 74.1% | $94,674 |
| Spain | 2,874 | 1.0% | 75.0% | $59,546 |
| New Zealand | 2,569 | 0.9% | 75.9% | $41,953 |
| Indonesia | 2,519 | 0.9% | 76.8% | $128,328 |
| Egypt | 2,403 | 0.8% | 77.6% | $80,665 |
| Venezuela | 2,281 | 0.8% | 78.4% | $85,257 |
| India | 1,906 | 0.6% | 79.0% | $70,199 |
| Russia | 1,816 | 0.6% | 79.6% | $123,687 |
| South Africa | 1,626 | 0.6% | 80.2% | $74,040 |
Source:Statistics of Income Bulletin, 2006.
Examining the amounts of income earned, we see that most of those earning foreign income earn at least in the six-figure range. Charts 5 and 6 present trends in the number of Form 2555 filers and average foreign earnings by region. As indicated above Europe and Asia, by far, are the top locations and provide the highest incomes.

We need to be careful in assessing the overseas home purchase potential of these households. The figures represent those who are currently making high incomes overseas and many of whom receive housing allowances from employers. Nevertheless, those in lucrative jobs such as finance, business consulting, and technology can afford to purchase property overseas. Analysis of Form 2555 data can provide estimates. However, the Form 2555 filers likely comprise a small subset of American foreign-home buyers.
In addition, while many Americans may live and purchase property overseas, they may not necessarily earn foreign income. For these households, any purchasing decision is probably driven less by a foreign employment situation than by a desire for a location. Also, some countries where the earnings are most lucrative may not be the most culturally comfortable for many Americans.
Based on the data discussed above, we suggest a procedure to derive a range of initial estimates regarding the stock of homes owned abroad by Americans. This process will generate a baseline set of figures that can be used as ‘ball park’ comparison measures. It will have obvious limitations, but it may be useful as a ‘first-cut’ effort until we obtain more data.
American media frequently assail the public with information on the ownership of exotic property abroad by celebrities and very wealthy Americans. However, the tables above show us that most American foreign property ownership is likely to be concentrated in North America, Central America, and the Caribbean. A second area of likely concentration would be the U.K. and a few other countries in Western Europe. Therefore, as a practical approach, in deriving a range of estimates we can ignore most of the rest of the world, as the probabilities of Americans purchasing property in many countries are not known and are likely to be quite low.
The 1999 State Department data for the areas discussed above offer a large source of information about where Americans have been located but also contain figures on the number of government employees stationed abroad who are not likely home purchasers. Social Security retirees provide a much smaller base, but they include Americans (and non-Americans) who have the experience and wealth to own property. [Note: A conversation with a Social Security staff analyst suggested that roughly half of all Social Security recipients abroad are not American citizens.]
Finally, the majority of filers of Form 2555 are likely affluent employees and well-compensated self-employed who live and work abroad. They are a small segment of all Americans, but represent those who definitely have the financial income levels to purchase foreign property. They are distinct from the American Social Security retirees so there is no overlap between the two databases.
However, many Form 2555 filers are overseas working on a temporary basis and thus are less likely to be purchasing a home abroad, especially if their employers are providing housing subsidies or other subsidized living arrangements. Furthermore, the lack of a U.S. mortgage interest deduction for foreign property in many countries may discourage some foreign ownership. On the other hand, those countries that do allow mortgage interest deductions on income taxes often require the owner(s) (including those Americans earning incomes abroad) to add an imputed rental value component to their income. The bottom-line impact is, therefore, a lesser tax benefit from owning a property abroad.
In order to determine the potential number of owner homes, we can apply American homeownership rates to our gross stock of people/households and use these to simulate the possible number of households that own a property overseas. The U.S. homeownership rate is calculated through a Census Bureau questionnaire that inquires whether a household that owns the property also occupies it. In general, U.S. homeownership rates are produced as a ratio or percentage of the number of owner-occupied households relative to the number of renter households. These figures are also broken out by age of the head of the household, so we can roughly differentiate between older and younger groups, as older households tend to be more likely to own their home. 6, 7
However, using the figures above necessitates converting the individual person retirees into households.8 There has been a slight decrease in the number of persons per household since 1999. In that year, there were 2.6 persons per household; in 2001 the figure was 2.59, and the current Census estimate is 2.55 persons per household. Retiree households are smaller, so those numbers need to be adjusted downward.
If we assume that Americans living in these countries were primarily civilian, nongovernment employees, the State Department data give us a baseline of the total American residents abroad at roughly the beginning of this decade. Assuming that the figures on the top 20 countries in 1999 are representative of the number of Americans living in those countries over the past few years, they can provide estimates of potential property owners abroad. We are also assuming a single owned property per household. Wealthy households may have several foreign short-stay residences.
Using the 1999 top 20 countries as a base, there were 1,370,658 persons abroad. If we apply a very conservative low homeownership rate of 40% [which corresponds to that for households under the age of 35, the lowest rate in 1999] and the 2.6 people per household ratio, we obtain about 527,200 potential homes owned abroad by Americans. The State Department’s 1999 total world figures imply about 640,600 Americans may own properties abroad.
These figures are small in comparison with the approximately 70 million owner-occupied homes in America.
However, it should be noted that only about 20% of Americans have passports, * a significantly lower rate than citizens in European countries and other parts of the world.9 The large numbers of Americans living abroad in the Northern hemisphere indicates a tendency to stay close to home. While overseas travel has become more common for Americans, and globalization has contributed to an increase of foreign job opportunities, it is still likely that Americans will tend to purchase property in close and convenient locations. This would suggest conservative ownership figures abroad, especially outside of North America.
Figures from the 2005 Social Security retired workers category indicates 235,991 individuals living abroad and receiving Social Security benefits in the top 25 countries. Since the homeownership rate has been about 80% for older Americans, and since many retirees are likely to have owned a home in the U.S., this base suggests the number of potential owners is about 188,800. However, assuming only about half of those retiree beneficiaries are American citizens, our base is only 94,400.
Household size ratio is also an issue. Most retirees are ‘empty nesters’ and many are widowed. The average household size in 2005 was 2.57 persons, but this is too large for a typical retiree household. We will use estimates of 2 and 1.5 persons per household. The latter
* It should be noted that these figures pre-date the most recent State Department and Homeland Security regulations requiring passports for Americans traveling anywhere outside the U.S. or U.S. territories.
ratios yield potential estimates of about 47,200 and 62,900 potential foreign-owned properties.
The relatively slow growth of retired workers abroad also suggests a relatively steady rate of foreign property ownership over a recent period of time. At this point, figures ranging from between 50,000 to 90,000 properties by this group seem an intelligent estimate.
Examining the top 25 countries, there are almost 219,300 filers of Form 2555. Moreover, many are earning six-figure incomes and certainly could afford foreign property ownership. Because married couples usually file jointly, it is also likely that these returns represent individual households. The question then becomes: Which homeownership rate shall we apply?
A conservative 40% homeownership rate yields about 87,700 potential property owners. If we use all 54 countries reported in the SOI data, the figure is 100,700 properties.
Table 5 provides estimates under various homeownership rate assumptions. The estimates have been rounded to emphasize the relative magnitudes. We are using a low homeownership rate of 40%, along with the relatively current U.S. homeownership rate of 68%, and a higher rate for older homeowners. Household sizes for retirees are provided for ratios of 2 and 1.5 persons, respectively. The number of countries is most important for the State and IRS bases and we have selected the most reasonable assumptions there.
Table 5: Simulated Property Ownership Abroad Assumed Homeownership Rates
| 40% 68% U.S. State Dept. (1999) (Americans Abroad) Top 20 countries 527,000 896,000 All countries 641,000 1,100,000 | 80% 1,100,000 1,300,000 |
| Social Security (2005) (Retired Workers) Household size: 2 24,000 40,000 Household size: 1.5 32,000 54,000 | 47,000 63,000 |
| IRA SOI (2001) (Form 2555 filers) Top 25 countries 88,000 149,000 All countries 101,000 171,000 | 175,000 201,000 |
| Source: Consultant Estimates |
|
Examining the State Department overseas figures, depending on the assumed homeownership rate of Americans abroad, they suggest a very wide range of from 500,000 to
1.3 million properties. One obvious drawback of using this data is that much of the demand for foreign ownership will likely come from Americans who are not routinely abroad but purchase properties for vacation or short-stays. This group is not represented in the State Department figures. The State Department data also include Americans employed by the government, civilian and military. Because most of these individuals are not likely to purchase housing abroad , to some extent they can compensate somewhat for the missing domestic demand. But, that extent at this point is not knowable. The bottom line: we can conservatively estimate in the range of 500,000 to 600,000 potential properties owned abroad.
While the Social Security and IRS data are more likely to give us close estimates, they ignore large segments of the U.S.-based demand for foreign properties. On the conservative side, if retired workers abroad are about as likely to own as domestics, their ownership numbers probably are in the 54,000 to 63,000-property range, given the assumption of a small household size. Examining the IRS figures for this group of private sector workers, it is more likely that their ownership rates are more conservative, at best the national average. Many of these well-compensated households are receiving some housing subsidies and extra compensation to cover their living costs. In extreme cases, they are living in employer-provided housing, or housing developed by the foreign country to house Americans during their working period. This would argue for a conservative ownership rate parameter. At this point, an educated guess is that for this group, the ownership of property abroad probably is in the range of 80,000 to 100,000 properties.
Combining the optimistic range from the Social Security data and the conservative figures from the IRS data, the ranges suggest roughly 130,000 to 160,000 properties owned abroad by these segments. These estimates contrast dramatically with the State Department figures. What is most likely is that many Americans have a principal residence in the U.S., but are purchasing seasonal stay and vacation properties located in our closest neighbors. However, since many Americans, especially upper-middle income households, own multiple properties in the U.S., the likelihood of owning a similar property outside the U.S. borders has to be lower.
Accordingly, the conservative 500,000 to 600,000 figure from the State Department may be a good estimator of the total world ownership abroad by all Americans, with roughly 370,000 to 440,000 properties owned by Americans who have a principal residence in the U.S. These figures seem very reasonable, with roughly three-quarters of the foreign properties near the
U.S. and used primarily as second/vacation homes.
Purchases in foreign countries have likely been occurring much more frequently over the recent decade of housing boom times and significant wealth accumulation by the Baby Boomer generation. However, there are large segments of the American demand for foreign property, which we cannot address with the above methodology.
We are also ignoring time-shares; they offer competition to individual ownership and provide an attractive short-stay/vacation option. Many time-shares are located in close-by foreign countries only a few hours away by airplane. However, without some very survey specific data we cannot be more accurate than this.
Our procedures provide no information on the flow of sales over time. Furthermore, the lack of contemporaneous time series for the three segments is a consistency limitation.
What is really needed to accurately measure the number and location of foreign homes owned and purchased by Americans is a large survey of the American public. For instance, the National Association of REALTORS®, in conducting future surveys of home buyers and sellers as well as second home and vacation property ownership, could include a question that asks specifically if the respondent purchased a property in a foreign country. However, the sample size will need to be large. Another possibility is that the Association’s members could be surveyed to determine the extent to which they have been involved in any foreign transactions – that is, sold a foreign property --or have knowledge of a client or friend who owns property abroad. These surveys could provide some useful parameters that would be helpful in filling in the gaps.
However, even with results from surveys such as these, determining the extent of American ownership of foreign properties is still challenging. Unless the U.S. Census Bureau asks a specific set of questions on this topic, analysts looking at the extent to which Americans purchase foreign properties will be piecing together many sets of information, looking for the connecting threads that provide a complete answer. In the short-run, a more recent and more detailed analysis of the IRS Form 2555 data would help us with a narrow segment of the potential buyers. Short of a decennial U.S. Census question, we are likely to be working with small segments and samples for a long time to come.
(Original Source: U.S. State Department Website July 1999)
| U.S. Citizens | % All U.S. | |
|---|---|---|
| Americas | in Country | Abroad |
| Mexico | 1,036,300 | 24.9% |
| Canada | 687,700 | 16.5% |
| Domin. Repub. | 82,000 | 2.0% |
| Brazil | 40,640 | 1.0% |
| Colombia | 30,680 | 0.7% |
| Argentina | 27,600 | 0.7% |
| Venezuela | 25,000 | 0.6% |
| Costa Rica | 19,800 | 0.5% |
| Panama | 19,700 | 0.5% |
| Peru | 14,143 | 0.3% |
| Ecuador | 13,824 | 0.3% |
| Barbados | 12,000 | 0.3% |
| Chile | 11,790 | 0.3% |
| Haiti | 11,000 | 0.3% |
| Honduras | 10,500 | 0.3% |
| Guatemala | 10,000 | 0.2% |
| El Salvador | 10,000 | 0.2% |
| Jamaica | 7,500 | 0.2% |
| Bahamas | 7,050 | 0.2% |
| Netherlands Antilles | 6,075 | 0.1% |
| Nicaragua | 5,000 | 0.1% |
| Bermuda | 4,300 | 0.1% |
| Uruguay | 3,500 | 0.1% |
| Trinidad & Tobago | 3,200 | 0.1% |
| Bolivia | 3,000 | 0.1% |
| Belize | 2,700 | 0.1% |
| Paraguay | 2,368 | 0.1% |
| Cuba | 2,000 | 0.0% |
| Grenada | 2,000 | 0.0% |
| Guyana | 1,500 | 0.0% |
| Surinam | 425 | 0.0% |
| Total | 2,113,295 | 50.8% |
|---|---|---|
|
|
U.S. Citizens | % All U.S. |
| Europe | in Country | Abroad |
| United Kingdom | 224,000 | 5.4% |
| Germany | 210,880 | 5.1% |
| Italy | 168,967 | 4.1% |
| France | 101,750 | 2.4% |
| Spain | 94,513 | 2.3% |
| Greece | 72,500 | 1.7% |
| Ireland | 46,984 | 1.1% |
| Poland | 39,300 | 0.9% |
| Belgium | 35,328 | 0.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 23,707 | 0.6% |
| Sweden | 18,000 | 0.4% |
| Hungary | 15,000 | 0.4% |
| Norway | 15,000 | 0.4% |
| Austria | 14,000 | 0.3% |
| Romania | 13,152 | 0.3% |
| Switzerland | 12,113 | 0.3% |
| Czech Republic | 10,000 | 0.2% |
| Russia | 9,448 | 0.2% |
| Denmark | 9,380 | 0.2% |
| Finland | 4,700 | 0.1% |
| Serbia-Montenegro | 4,514 | 0.1% |
| Cyprus | 4,175 | 0.1% |
| Ukraine | 3,000 | 0.1% |
| Portugal | 2,172 | 0.1% |
| Latvia | 2,084 | 0.1% |
| Croatia | 1,921 | 0.0% |
| Iceland | 1,730 | 0.0% |
| Bosnia-Herzegovina | 1,600 | 0.0% |
| Luxembourg | 1,527 | 0.0% |
| Lithuania | 1,500 | 0.0% |
| Estonia | 1,000 | 0.0% |
| Slovak Republic | 850 | 0.0% |
| Macedonia | 800 | 0.0% |
| Malta | 700 | 0.0% |
| Slovenia | 650 | 0.0% |
| Albania | 646 | 0.0% |
| Azerbaijan | 600 | 0.0% |
| Bulgaria | 400 | 0.0% |
| Georgia | 303 | 0.0% |
| Armenia | 229 | 0.0% |
| Belarus | 190 | 0.0% |
| Moldova | 125 | 0.0% |
| Total | 1,169,438 | 28.1% |
|
|
U.S. Citizens | % All U.S. |
| Asia-Pacific | in Country | Abroad |
| Philippines | 105,000 | 2.5% |
| Australia | 102,800 | 2.5% |
| Japan | 70,350 | 1.7% |
| China | 65,157 | 1.6% |
| Taiwan | 38,000 | 0.9% |
| S. Korea | 30,000 | 0.7% |
| Thailand | 18,100 | 0.4% |
| India | 15,369 | 0.4% |
| Singapore | 15,000 | 0.4% |
| New Zealand | 14,540 | 0.3% |
| Indonesia | 9,058 | 0.2% |
| Malaysia | 6,639 | 0.2% |
|---|---|---|
| Fiji | 5,288 | 0.1% |
| Pakistan | 4,231 | 0.1% |
| Kazakhstan | 3,600 | 0.1% |
| Vietnam | 3,000 | 0.1% |
| Papua New Guinea | 2,468 | 0.1% |
| Nepal | 1,600 | 0.0% |
| Bangladesh | 1,320 | 0.0% |
| Cambodia | 1,200 | 0.0% |
| Micronesia | 760 | 0.0% |
| Sri Lanka | 658 | 0.0% |
| Uzbekistan | 590 | 0.0% |
| Marshall Islands | 580 | 0.0% |
| Western Samoa | 495 | 0.0% |
| Mongolia | 450 | 0.0% |
| Burma (Myanmar) | 332 | 0.0% |
| Palau | 300 | 0.0% |
| Laos | 293 | 0.0% |
| Brunei | 248 | 0.0% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 150 | 0.0% |
| Tajikistan | 117 | 0.0% |
| Turkmenistan | 107 | 0.0% |
| Iran | 0 | 0.0% |
| Iraq | 0 | 0.0% |
| Afghanistan | 0 | 0.0% |
| N. Korea | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 517,800 | 12.4% |
|
|
U.S. Citizens | % All U.S. |
| Middle East | in Country | Abroad |
| Israel | 184,195 | 4.4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 35,989 | 0.9% |
| United Arab Emirates | 16,500 | 0.4% |
| Yemen | 15,300 | 0.4% |
| Lebanon | 10,000 | 0.2% |
| Jordan | 8,000 | 0.2% |
| Kuwait | 7,710 | 0.2% |
| Turkey | 7,076 | 0.2% |
| Syria | 3,856 | 0.1% |
| Qatar | 3,775 | 0.1% |
| Bahrain | 1,800 | 0.0% |
| Oman | 1,444 | 0.0% |
| Total | 295,645 | 7.1% |
|
|
U.S. Citizens | % All U.S. |
| Africa | in Country | Abroad |
| South Africa | 11,467 | 0.3% |
| Egypt | 10,892 | 0.3% |
| Nigeria | 10,000 | 0.2% |
Kenya 4,237 0.1% Ghana 3,780 0.1% Ethiopia 2,190 0.1% Zimbabwe 2,125 0.1% Ivory Coast 2,100 0.1% Sudan 1,479 0.0% Morocco 1,401 0.0% Uganda 1,350 0.0% Tanzania 1,186 0.0% Cameroon 1,161 0.0% Cape Verde 1,000 0.0% Zambia 980 0.0% Malawi 863 0.0% Angola 845 0.0% Botswana 800 0.0% Algeria 793 0.0% Senegal 791 0.0% Tunisia 700 0.0% Guinea 660 0.0% Mozambique 641 0.0% Gambia 546 0.0% Mali 460 0.0% Congo, Dem. Repub. 440 0.0% Madagascar 372 0.0% Eritrea 356 0.0% Swaziland 352 0.0% Namibia 350 0.0% Niger 335 0.0% Burkina Faso 329 0.0% Togo 329 0.0% Mauritius 320 0.0% Gabon 298 0.0% Benin 250 0.0% Congo, Repub. 233 0.0% Liberia 220 0.0% Lesotho 190 0.0% Rwanda 165 0.0% Chad 162 0.0% Sierra Leone 130 0.0% Mauritania 100 0.0% Central African Repub. 91 0.0% Djibouti 50 0.0% Burundi 46 0.0% Equatorial Guinea 30 0.0% Guinea-Bissau 25 0.0% Somalia 12 0.0%
Number of Recipients and Dollar Amounts of Social Security Benefits : 1999 - 2005
(Countries with 500 or more beneficiaries; totals include all foreign residents)
Total Monthly Benefits
| All | Retired | All | Retirees Avg. Monthly Benefits | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2005 | Beneficiaries | Workers | ($000s) | ($000s) | All | Retirees |
| All countries | 441,693 | 263,387 | 235,254 | 149,425 | $533 | $567 |
| Canada | 100,747 | 59,022 | 45,396 | 28,116 | $451 | $476 |
| Mexico | 47,384 | 22,973 | 24,820 | 13,033 | $524 | $567 |
| Central America |
|
|||||
| and Caribbean | 22,407 | 15,743 | 15,521 | 11,537 | $693 | $733 |
| Barbados | 1,036 | 860 | 810 | 692 | $782 | $805 |
| Costa Rica | 3,540 | 2,418 | 2,790 | 2,020 | $788 | $835 |
| Dominican |
|
|||||
| Republic | 6,503 | 4,270 | 3,983 | 2,823 | $612 | $661 |
| El Salvador | 973 | 685 | 609 | 443 | $626 | $647 |
| Guatemala | 1,240 | 832 | 825 | 574 | $665 | $690 |
| Honduras | 954 | 611 | 696 | 479 | $730 | $784 |
| Jamaica | 2,724 | 2,182 | 1,880 | 1,564 | $690 | $717 |
| Panama | 1,117 | 692 | 813 | 523 | $728 | $756 |
| Trinidad and |
|
|||||
| Tobago | 881 | 691 | 675 | 547 | $766 | $792 |
| South America | 14,925 | 10,213 | 10,065 | 7,197 | $674 | $705 |
| Argentina | 3,221 | 2,052 | 2,091 | 1,431 | $649 | $697 |
| Brazil | 1,956 | 1,171 | 1,412 | 895 | $722 | $764 |
| Chile | 1,382 | 935 | 997 | 708 | $721 | $757 |
| Colombia | 3,301 | 2,427 | 2,190 | 1,645 | $663 | $678 |
| Ecuador | 2,350 | 1,736 | 1,513 | 1,153 | $644 | $664 |
| Peru | 911 | 612 | 639 | 447 | $701 | $730 |
| Uruguay | 776 | 590 | 499 | 396 | $643 | $671 |
| Africa | 1,887 | 1,114 | 1,331 | 878 | $705 | $788 |
| Asia | 45,034 | 23,293 | 29,127 | 17,397 | $647 | $747 |
| Cyprus | 508 | 295 | 320 | 204 | $630 | $692 |
| Hong Kong | 929 | 517 | 588 | 368 | $633 | $712 |
| India | 912 | 619 | 649 | 455 | $712 | $735 |
| Israel | 8,571 | 4,879 | 5,760 | 3,782 | $672 | $775 |
| Japan | 7,972 | 3,980 | 5,641 | 3,276 | $708 | $823 |
| Philippines | 19,309 | 9,165 | 11,509 | 6,253 | $596 | $682 |
| Thailand | 1,552 | 1,118 | 1,374 | 1,023 | $885 | $915 |
| Turkey | 685 | 426 | 502 | 329 | $733 | $772 |
| Yemen | 1,456 | 452 | 710 | 333 | $488 | $737 |
| Europe | 201,217 | 125,795 | 103,720 | 67,578 | $515 | $537 |
| Austria | 2,452 | 1,559 | 1,263 | 812 | $515 | $521 |
| Belgium | 1,722 | 1,062 | 892 | 574 | $518 | $540 |
| Croatia | 1,485 | 899 | 1,119 | 717 | $754 | $798 |
| Czech Republic | 572 | 416 | 481 | 357 | $841 | $858 |
| Denmark | 868 | 538 | 643 | 405 | $741 | $753 |
| Finland | 815 | 519 | 470 | 302 | $577 | $582 |
| France | 10,661 | 6,930 | 5,839 | 4,076 | $548 | $588 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 33,448 | 20,837 | 14,896 | 9,095 | $445 | $436 | ||||
| Greece | 22,640 | 13,416 | 11,678 | 7,409 | $516 | $552 | ||||
| Hungary | 1,903 | 1,436 | 1,609 | 1,265 | $846 | $881 | ||||
| Ireland | 8,518 | 5,738 | 5,113 | 3,688 | $600 | $643 | ||||
| Italy | 33,865 | 20,010 | 17,461 | 10,975 | $516 | $548 | ||||
| Malta | 584 | 312 | 418 | 239 | $716 | $766 | ||||
| Netherlands | 4,407 | 2,798 | 1,942 | 1,261 | $441 | $451 | ||||
| Norway | 6,432 | 3,820 | 2,571 | 1,550 | $400 | $406 | ||||
| Poland | 5,268 | 3,607 | 2,992 | 2,017 | $568 | $559 | ||||
| Portugal | 12,050 | 8,243 | 6,547 | 4,645 | $543 | $564 | ||||
| Serbia | 959 | 592 | 666 | 415 | $694 | $701 | ||||
| Spain | 9,875 | 5,817 | 5,606 | 3,566 | $568 | $613 | ||||
| Sweden | 3,464 | 2,287 | 1,502 | 974 | $434 | $426 | ||||
| Switzerland | 6,435 | 4,367 | 2,654 | 1,850 | $412 | $424 | ||||
| United Kingdom | 30,210 | 18,884 | 15,599 | 10,155 | $516 | $538 | ||||
| Oceania | 8,092 | 5,234 | 5,275 | 3,689 | $652 | $705 | ||||
| Australia | 6,656 | 4,310 | 4,196 | 2,909 | $630 | $675 | ||||
| New Zealand | 1,003 | 695 | 783 | 593 | $781 | $853 | ||||
|
|
Total Monthly Benefits |
|
||||||||
|
|
All | Retired | All | Retirees | Avg. Monthly Benefits | |||||
| December 2004 | Beneficiaries | Workers | ($000s) | ($000s) | All | Retirees | ||||
| All countries | 431,138 | 254,985 | 220,839 | 139,528 | $512 | $547 | ||||
| Canada | 98,390 | 57,160 | 42,778 | 26,414 | $435 | $462 | ||||
| Mexico | 47,363 | 22,938 | 23,697 | 12,488 | $500 | $544 | ||||
| Central America |
|
|||||||||
| and Caribbean | 21,777 | 15,121 | 14,344 | 10,591 | $659 | $700 | ||||
| Barbados | 1,081 | 894 | 806 | 686 | $746 | $767 | ||||
| Costa Rica | 3,341 | 2,257 | 2,496 | 1,800 | $747 | $798 | ||||
| Dominican |
|
|||||||||
| Republic | 6,302 | 4,043 | 3,659 | 2,552 | $581 | $631 | ||||
| El Salvador | 887 | 605 | 529 | 373 | $596 | $617 | ||||
| Guatemala | 1,205 | 806 | 767 | 531 | $637 | $659 | ||||
| Honduras | 925 | 578 | 633 | 431 | $684 | $746 | ||||
| Jamaica | 2,725 | 2,151 | 1,796 | 1,475 | $659 | $686 | ||||
| Panama | 994 | 611 | 678 | 443 | $682 | $725 | ||||
| Trinidad and |
|
|||||||||
| Tobago | 887 | 688 | 654 | 523 | $737 | $760 | ||||
| South America | 14,190 | 9,587 | 9,086 | 6,417 | $640 | $669 | ||||
| Argentina | 3,101 | 1,954 | 1,908 | 1,297 | $615 | $664 | ||||
| Brazil | 1,870 | 1,107 | 1,279 | 798 | $684 | $721 | ||||
| Chile | 1,283 | 852 | 887 | 622 | $691 | $730 | ||||
| Colombia | 3,063 | 2,224 | 1,930 | 1,433 | $630 | $644 | ||||
| Ecuador | 2,281 | 1,663 | 1,393 | 1,045 | $611 | $628 | ||||
| Peru | 849 | 567 | 566 | 392 | $667 | $691 | ||||
| Uruguay | 730 | 541 | 444 | 345 | $608 | $638 | ||||
| Africa | 1,829 | 1,065 | 1,222 | 798 | $668 | $749 | ||||
| Asia | 43,585 | 22,027 | 26,725 | 15,701 | $613 | $713 | ||||
| Cyprus | 529 | 304 | 317 | 199 | $599 | $655 | ||||
Hong Kong 877 471 531 321 $605 $682 India
820 555 565 392 $689 $706 Israel 8,478 4,767 5,446 3,556 $642 $746 Japan 7,435 3,708 5,070 2,931 $682 $790 Philippines 18,955 8,732 10,656 5,651 $562 $647 Thailand 1,324 946 1,113 826 $841 $873 Turkey 653 402 458 298 $701 $741 Yemen 1,581 465 714 327 $452 $703 Europe 196,537 122,340 98,257 63,854 $500 $522 Austria 2,406 1,524 1,223 796 $508 $522 Belgium 1,656 1,027 851 553 $514 $538 Croatia 1,478 859 1,052 646 $712 $752 Czech Republic 541 387 430 315 $795 $814
Denmark
877 535 620 382 $707 $714 Finland
780 496 447 282 $573 $569 France 10,340 6,708 5,476 3,814 $530 $569 Germany 31,957 19,826 13,912 8,481 $435 $428 Greece 22,512 13,234 11,188 7,058 $497 $533 Hungary 1,882 1,414 1,520 1,195 $808 $845 Ireland 8,263 5,618 4,848 3,532 $587 $629 Italy 34,098 20,136 17,027 10,667 $499 $530
Malta
577 310 395 224 $685 $723 Netherlands 4,218 2,661 1,827 1,195 $433 $449 Norway 6,283 3,702 2,460 1,469 $392 $397 Poland 4,863 3,310 2,716 1,811 $559 $547 Portugal 12,032 8,181 6,208 4,381 $516 $536
Serbia
963 579 636 380 $660 $656 Spain 9,646 5,668 5,261 3,342 $545 $590 Sweden 3,231 2,129 1,410 920 $436 $432 Switzerland 6,125 4,137 2,447 1,702 $400 $411 United Kingdom 29,305 18,263 14,662 9,563 $500 $524
Oceania 7,467 4,747 4,730 3,265 $633 $688
Australia 6,126 3,905 3,772 2,588 $616 $663
New Zealand 942 644 700 526 $743 $817
| Total Monthly Benefits | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Retired | All | Retirees | Avg. Monthly Benefits | |||||
| December 2003 | Beneficiaries | Workers | ($000s) | ($000s) | All | Retirees | |||
| All countries | 423,062 | 248,012 | $211,538 | $132,725 | $500 | $535 | |||
| Canada | 96,810 | 55,848 | $41,212 | $25,352 | $426 | $454 | |||
| Mexico | 48,328 | 23,302 | $23,386 | $12,315 | $484 | $528 | |||
| Central America |
|
||||||||
| and Caribbean | 21,288 | 14,675 | $13,561 | $9,921 | $637 | $676 | |||
| Barbados | 1,060 | 873 | $765 | $643 | $722 | $737 | |||
| Costa Rica | 3,171 | 2,116 | $2,281 | $1,626 | $719 | $768 | |||
| Dominican |
|
||||||||
| Republic | 6,106 | 3,869 | $3,425 | $2,344 | $561 | $606 | |||
| El Salvador | 853 | 583 | $490 | $346 | $574 | $593 | |||
| Guatemala | 1,164 | 769 | $706 | $488 | $607 | $635 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honduras | 923 | 578 | $621 | $425 | $673 | $735 |
| Jamaica | 2,734 | 2,159 | $1,755 | $1,442 | $642 | $668 |
| Panama | 955 | 579 | $625 | $400 | $654 | $691 |
| Trinidad and |
|
|||||
| Tobago | 849 | 664 | $609 | $486 | $717 | $732 |
| South America | 13,540 | 9,057 | $8,358 | $5,839 | $617 | $645 |
| Argentina | 2,959 | 1,853 | $1,756 | $1,182 | $593 | $638 |
| Brazil | 1,808 | 1,050 | $1,184 | $720 | $655 | $686 |
| Chile | 1,200 | 789 | $806 | $556 | $672 | $705 |
| Colombia | 2,858 | 2,040 | $1,733 | $1,264 | $606 | $620 |
| Ecuador | 2,230 | 1,614 | $1,315 | $981 | $590 | $608 |
| Peru | 796 | 533 | $513 | $360 | $644 | $675 |
| Uruguay | 681 | 508 | $397 | $310 | $583 | $610 |
| Africa | 1,717 | 994 | $1,114 | $723 | $649 | $727 |
| Asia | 42,198 | 20,947 | $24,846 | $14,379 | $589 | $686 |
| Cyprus | 522 | 310 | $304 | $195 | $582 | $629 |
| Hong Kong | 846 | 439 | $488 | $283 | $577 | $645 |
| India | 713 | 485 | $474 | $330 | $665 | $680 |
| Israel | 8,363 | 4,716 | $5,227 | $3,431 | $625 | $728 |
| Japan | 6,924 | 3,431 | $4,600 | $2,633 | $664 | $767 |
| Philippines | 18,688 | 8,371 | $10,056 | $5,201 | $538 | $621 |
| Thailand | 1,131 | 804 | $908 | $673 | $803 | $837 |
| Turkey | 649 | 400 | $433 | $284 | $667 | $710 |
| Yemen | 1,583 | 442 | $679 | $295 | $429 | $667 |
| Europe | 192,433 | 118,941 | $94,753 | $61,225 | $492 | $515 |
| Austria | 2,323 | 1,478 | $1,167 | $763 | $502 | $516 |
| Belgium | 1,629 | 1,017 | $819 | $538 | $503 | $529 |
| Croatia | 1,471 | 834 | $1,017 | $605 | $691 | $725 |
| Denmark | 878 | 520 | $592 | $359 | $674 | $690 |
| Finland | 760 | 496 | $433 | $279 | $570 | $563 |
| France | 9,911 | 6,414 | $5,138 | $3,569 | $518 | $556 |
| Germany | 30,659 | 18,889 | $13,316 | $8,095 | $434 | $429 |
| Greece | 22,394 | 13,027 | $10,889 | $6,801 | $486 | $522 |
| Hungary | 1,804 | 1,360 | $1,418 | $1,115 | $786 | $820 |
| Ireland | 8,093 | 5,490 | $4,680 | $3,407 | $578 | $621 |
| Italy | 34,223 | 20,080 | $16,772 | $10,418 | $490 | $519 |
| Malta | 590 | 315 | $387 | $219 | $656 | $695 |
| Netherlands | 4,083 | 2,567 | $1,780 | $1,165 | $436 | $454 |
| Norway | 6,169 | 3,589 | $2,402 | $1,430 | $389 | $398 |
| Poland | 4,540 | 3,039 | $2,500 | $1,642 | $551 | $540 |
| Portugal | 11,932 | 8,029 | $5,963 | $4,155 | $500 | $517 |
| Serbia | 959 | 557 | $622 | $355 | $649 | $637 |
| Spain | 9,427 | 5,541 | $5,046 | $3,211 | $535 | $579 |
| Sweden | 3,062 | 2,022 | $1,343 | $881 | $439 | $436 |
| Switzerland | 5,889 | 3,979 | $2,330 | $1,624 | $396 | $408 |
| United Kingdom | 28,607 | 17,705 | $14,117 | $9,190 | $493 | $519 |
| Oceania | 6,748 | 4,248 | $4,307 | $2,971 | $638 | $699 |
| Australia | 5,481 | 3,454 | $3,447 | $2,364 | $629 | $684 |
| New Zealand | 871 | 599 | $620 | $465 | $712 | $776 |
Total Monthly Benefits
| All | Retired | All | Retirees | Avg. Monthly Benefits | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2002 | Beneficiaries | Workers | ($000s) | ($000s) | All | Retirees | |
| All countries | 415,179 | 242,128 | $203,428 | $127,212 | $490 | $306 | |
| Canada | 94,693 | 54,488 | $39,887 | $24,537 | $421 | $259 | |
| Mexico | 49,105 | 23,782 | $23,195 | $12,322 | $472 | $251 | |
| Central America |
|
||||||
| and Caribbean | 20,636 | 14,099 | $12,755 | $9,272 | $618 | $449 | |
| Barbados | 1,048 | 850 | $736 | $608 | $702 | $580 | |
| Costa Rica | 3,020 | 2,010 | $2,082 | $1,488 | $689 | $493 | |
| Dominican |
|
||||||
| Republic | 5,763 | 3,639 | $3,155 | $2,152 | $547 | $373 | |
| El Salvador | 821 | 555 | $457 | $318 | $557 | $387 | |
| Guatemala | 1,142 | 732 | $665 | $450 | $582 | $394 | |
| Honduras | 937 | 568 | $612 | $409 | $653 | $436 | |
| Jamaica | 2,711 | 2,124 | $1,694 | $1,382 | $625 | $510 | |
| Panama | 880 | 534 | $554 | $354 | $630 | $402 | |
| Trinidad and |
|
||||||
| Tobago | 855 | 663 | $590 | $468 | $690 | $547 | |
| South America | 13,065 | 8,677 | $7,859 | $5,473 | $602 | $419 | |
| Argentina | 2,866 | 1,794 | $1,656 | $1,115 | $578 | $389 | |
| Brazil | 1,757 | 1,022 | $1,118 | $685 | $636 | $390 | |
| Chile | 1,133 | 736 | $749 | $515 | $661 | $455 | |
| Colombia | 2,692 | 1,904 | $1,590 | $1,153 | $591 | $428 | |
| Ecuador | 2,187 | 1,592 | $1,267 | $949 | $579 | $434 | |
| Peru | 755 | 501 | $474 | $333 | $628 | $441 | |
| Uruguay | 635 | 463 | $353 | $269 | $556 | $424 | |
| Africa | 1,566 | 890 | $970 | $619 | $619 | $395 | |
| Asia | 41,076 | 19,983 | $23,375 | $13,337 | $569 | $325 | |
| Cyprus | 527 | 302 | $291 | $183 | $552 | $347 | |
| Hong Kong | 830 | 398 | $464 | $248 | $559 | $299 | |
| India | 691 | 455 | $435 | $296 | $630 | $428 | |
| Israel | 8,326 | 4,677 | $5,096 | $3,333 | $612 | $400 | |
| Japan | 6,527 | 3,176 | $4,225 | $2,376 | $647 | $364 | |
| Philippines | 18,408 | 8,070 | $9,538 | $4,856 | $518 | $264 | |
| Thailand | 1,004 | 720 | $775 | $581 | $772 | $579 | |
| Turkey | 633 | 389 | $407 | $265 | $643 | $419 | |
| Yemen | 1,589 | 419 | $656 | $273 | $413 | $172 | |
| Europe | 189,007 | 116,406 | $91,530 | $58,980 | $484 | $312 | |
| Austria | 2,252 | 1,463 | $1,118 | $747 | $496 | $332 | |
| Belgium | 1,610 | 1,012 | $804 | $535 | $499 | $332 | |
| Croatia | 1,452 | 789 | $966 | $552 | $665 | $380 | |
| Denmark | 876 | 530 | $575 | $359 | $656 | $410 | |
| Finland | 745 | 485 | $422 | $270 | $566 | $362 | |
| France | 9,728 | 6,318 | $4,932 | $3,446 | $507 | $354 | |
| Germany | 29,500 | 18,141 | $12,717 | $7,743 | $431 | $262 | |
| Greece | 22,235 | 12,767 | $10,598 | $6,544 | $477 | $294 | |
| Hungary | 1,771 | 1,330 | $1,354 | $1,061 | $765 | $599 | |
| Ireland | 7,893 | 5,356 | $4,461 | $3,240 | $565 | $410 | |
| Italy | 34,651 | 20,211 | $16,697 | $10,304 | $482 | $297 | |
|
|
31 |
|
|||||
Malta
595 308 $376 $211 $632 $355 Netherlands 3,999 2,497 $1,743 $1,130 $436 $283 Norway 6,130 3,583 $2,381 $1,429 $388 $233 Poland 4,134 2,718 $2,257 $1,465 $546 $354 Portugal 11,858 7,927 $5,753 $3,984 $485 $336
Serbia
971 535 $618 $328 $636 $338 Spain 9,217 5,404 $4,797 $3,038 $520 $330 Sweden 2,950 1,951 $1,291 $851 $438 $288 Switzerland 5,693 3,862 $2,221 $1,559 $390 $274 United Kingdom 27,854 17,311 $13,551 $8,862 $487 $318
Oceania 6,031 3,803 $3,857 $2,673 $640 $443
Australia 4,849 3,079 $3,093 $2,140 $638 $441
New Zealand 804 541 $546 $405 $679 $504
| Total Monthly Benefits | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Retired | All | Retirees | Avg. Monthly Benefits | |||||
| December 2001 | Beneficiaries | Workers | ($000s) | ($000s) | All | Retirees | |||
| All countries | 407,466 | 235,797 | 196,861 | 122,452 | $483 | $519 | |||
| Canada | 92,418 | 52,990 | 38,670 | 23,772 | $418 | $449 | |||
| Mexico | 49,734 | 23,903 | 23,065 | 12,256 | $464 | $513 | |||
| Central America |
|
||||||||
| and Caribbean | 20,159 | 13,609 | 12,154 | 8,768 | $603 | $644 | |||
| Barbados | 1,013 | 813 | 699 | 572 | $690 | $704 | |||
| Costa Rica | 2,859 | 1,876 | 1,906 | 1,347 | $667 | $718 | |||
| Dominican |
|
||||||||
| Republic | 5,608 | 3,476 | 2,987 | 2,011 | $533 | $579 | |||
| El Salvador | 774 | 514 | 414 | 289 | $535 | $562 | |||
| Guatemala | 1,082 | 690 | 616 | 413 | $569 | $599 | |||
| Honduras | 967 | 590 | 627 | 420 | $648 | $712 | |||
| Jamaica | 2,735 | 2,128 | 1,685 | 1,369 | $616 | $643 | |||
| Panama | 856 | 516 | 528 | 338 | $617 | $655 | |||
| Trinidad and |
|
||||||||
| Tobago | 829 | 638 | 557 | 441 | $672 | $691 | |||
| South America | 12,823 | ||||||||